I do love to read. And I know you do too. But today, I thought it would be nice to have a different sort of confessional. Because you see, there are some books I have tried to read but can't. Well, maybe can't isn't exactly the right word. I'm certain I could read them. But, as a middle aged woman, I know life doesn't last forever. And it is way too short to read some books.
Even books that others consider classics. Which is what makes this sort of confession hard. While a large segment of the population might be offended if I said I wasn't going to read Twilight (which I did - although I don't think it is the bee's knees), people tend to look at you with that PBS documentary host down-the-nose-glance when you tell them you didn't care for a particular classic.
I have a theory. I think almost all of us have grabbed that prize-winner off the shelf, started it, and then thought, "Who decided this was the cream of literature?" It is interesting to google "100 best books" and see the multitude of lists that pop up. Of course, lists like this are by their nature completely subjective. Some books make every list while others only show up on one. I'm always happy when I've read several on each list and agree that they were good books. So, I'm going to let you in on my dark literary secrets.
I didn't like One Hundred Years of Solitude by Marquez. Oh, how I wanted to like this book. I plodded. I worked. I plowed. About half way through I decided I just didn't want to go any further. Unless I could go smack some of the characters in the book. Since I couldn't do that, I packed it up and gleefully drove back to the library.
Reading Lolita in Tehran by Nafisi. I wanted to like this one too. It was all the rage in book clubs for so long. And, my typical favorite genre is anything set in a different culture. But I couldn't do it.
And, embarrassingly enough, I don't like The Lord of the Rings trilogy. We own a resource book to help people keep up with the world Tolkien created for the books. My boys love them. My husband loves them. Not me. I didn't even like the movies and they at least had Orlando Bloom in them.
Isn't literature fascinating by its very subjectiveness? If we all loved the same books, we would lose so much variety and diversity in life. I'm always thrilled that our schools seem to do such an outstanding job exposing our children to a wide variety of genres and authors. I've watched each of my children develop an appreciation for types of literature they didn't realize they would enjoy at all.I've also been the one to comfort the son when he came home and confessed that he had done poorly on a Shakespeare test that he had tried his best to prepare for. I told him that was fine. I always thought Shakespeare was overrated anyway.
128 comments:
It was Viggo Mortensen who got me through Lord of the Rings. Was Orlando Bloom in that trilogy???
I've discovered that if I use IE I can comment here, firefox no!
We seem to have similar taste in books.
I too do not like the Lord of the Rings books, I read the Twilight series and didn't love it either. I kept waiting for something BIG to happen and it never did. I also didn't like that Edward was such a bossy prat. I preferred Jacob.
Love your posts!
Goodness, I'm third! You must have only posted 12 seconds ago, Debbie!
I hated the LOTR books, but loved the movies. Those big war scenes have sure made a few B of M stories come alive!
A few classic non-starters for me include "Wuthering Heights", which honestly had me reaching for a cyanide capsule at every page. And "The Secret Life of Bees" could seriously be used as a cure for insomnia. Can't wait for the movie; I could use a nap.
Ooooh, I was with you until the Shakespeare thing...
I am more apt to reading children books they just make more sense to me in just this crazy world....And may I say Amen to your admissions...You rock!
Uh I dont like any of that stuff either. I hope you tried my books (did I suggest any?) If I didnt here are some great reads...
Anything by Jodi Picoult (I mean any of her books are great, especially the one I am reading right now called Handle with Care)
Good Grief by Lolly Winston
The Time Travelers Wife by Audrey Niffenegger
If I stay by Gayle Forman (actually for teens but I dont know any teens deep enough for this story)
All Jane Porters books including Mrs. Perfect, Odd Mom Out, Easy on the Eyes and Flirting with Forty (which was made into a lifetime movie...)
I'm with ya. There are just some books that I cant' get into! I'm reading but thinking of something else at the same time...lol.
funny that you picked out the same books i would have.
reading lolita was one of those books i thought i HAD to read.
couldn't. just couldn't.
Mmm, Orlando Bloom. Posting a picture like that makes it very difficult to read the post around it. Or is that just me?
Couldn't get through Lord of the Rings either. And that was still in my stubborn stage when I used to carry on anyway. I read it to halfway through the second book! Another couple of days I'll never get back.
Coming from the North-east of England, I'm embarrassed to admit to not being able to get past the first page of a Catherine Cookson novel. She wrote novels about life in the north-east English mining community and is highly revered in our part of the country. I feel like a traitor!
So, what books do you love? I'm curious because I'll bet you have some interesting ones as your favorites.
There are some books that just don't do it for me, either. I think that is true for all of us - if we are honest.
The Great Gatsby. I've tried the book 3 times. I tried the movie twice. I know I'm supposed to like it. I'm almost ashamed of not liking it. I'm almost ashamed to post it here, lest I be judged. But I just. couldn't. like it.
I've been an avid reader since early childhood and back then and in high school, I read just about any type of book. My all time favorite was (still is) Gone With The Wind. (I do tend to love big fat books.) But in recent years I find myself often unable to complete several books. I've lost track now of how many books I have started and not yet finished -"The Count of Monte Cristo" was given to me six years ago this summer and I've still not even reached the half-way point in it. Then there's Anna Karenia -I'm maybe half-way through it now. "The Shack" which a blogger friend sent me early last fall is at the half-way mark and has been there since last November. One book -highly touted as a best seller -by Toni Morrison -"Paradise" is one I struggled with, trying at least three times, possibly four, to read it and each time I got so weighed down -more like mired in quicksand of not being able to make heads or tails out of it and I finally gave up completely. (Well, Oprah had warned everyone it was a "difficult" book to read and she wasn't just whistling Dixie when she said that in my opinion.)
Right now, I'm working on the book by President Obama about his life, his father, etc and to show how interested I am in this, I can't for the life of me remember the title -and I'm too darned tired (or lazy) to get up and pull the book out of its hiding spot in my table by my recliner! Arrgh!
If it makes you feel any better, you and I are on the same page... ;)
Hahaha...good for you!
I had the same problem with Gone with the Wind. I was 14, the book was four inches thick, and none of the characters appealed to me. Maybe it's time to try again? LOL
Oh, and Shakespeare is HIGHLY overrated. He was the equivalent of a sitcome writer in his day...and sprinkled his work liberally with bawdy humor to keep the rotten tomatoes at bay. ;-)
I just read the newspaper because the stuff out of the politicians mouths is enough fiction for me. Bastards!!!
I went to Barnes and Noble for the first time in months yesterday and I was reminded how much I love to read and that I need to make time for it.
I agree completely about life being too short for some books. I like light fiction....
I have the 50 page rule. If I'm not lovin' it by 50 pages? I'm movin' on. Life's too short and there are too many books.
Thank You! Now I don't feel like such a loser when I say I don't "get" the whole Twilight thing. I tried, I really, really did.
I don't get Steinbeck, either, but please keep that between us. :)
I really, really, wanted to make it through Ulysses when Marinka had her on-line book club.
Just couldn't do it. . .
I pretty much force my way through anything because I'm determined not to let the book beat me. There's only one book I couldn't finish and I tried 3 times to start it again. Shadowland by Peter Straub. My husband tried it too and he failed as well.
I read pretty much anything and everything, after making it through some of the most boring books on theory anything else is worth it. Sometimes though if I'm not into a book, I put it down and pick it up like 6 months or a year later. I will finish it in due time.
I can beat everybody. If I can't get into a book on the first page, it's gone. *sigh*
We may be literary twins. I didn't like "reading lolita", haven't read the LOTR but I despise the movies and Shakespeare YUCK! Give me some Jane Austen and I am a happy camper. As long as we are "confessing" I should say that I also LOVED "Story telling" by Tori Spelling. Ah, I feel much better now ;)
I always read less in the summer, and I love Shakespeare. But I never read Moby Dick. And I never plan to. :)
Ellie
The "classic" I could NOT read was Crime and Punishment. The more I read, the more I hated it, and I just couldn't give it the chance everyone told me it deserved. I quit the book.
But I do love Shakespeare.
My son loves all the books you named, but he is an English major. I totally do not get Shakespeare and he took a Shakespeare class last year and loved it and talked about it ALL the time. He'd call and that would be all he'd want to talk about. No wonder he doesn't have a girlfriend. ;)
I know of what you speak, there are many classics that I've found better suited as sleep aids than stimulating reading. That said, I did love Twilight...maybe I'm just a sucker for High School love.
That is funny. I used to feel like I had to finish any book I started - you know, you invest a certain amount of time, you must see it through.
Now? I just don't have time for books that aren't good. If it doesn't enchant me by the third chapter, back to the library it goes.
100 years of Solitude...I tried too and just couldn't get through it either. I thought I was alone.
I love books too! My husband was totally into Lord of the Rings, me....not so much. My favorite book ever is: How My Breasts Saved the World by Lisa Wood Shapiro. I missed your eariler post and didn't get a chance to say that, so I felt I had to say it now. :)
I am a flaky pop culture ho...so I don't read many classics...I love Nicholas Sparks.Shopaholic.Twilight!
I'm having the same guilt over not being able to finish "De côté de Chez Swann." I feel so worthless!
Glad to know that you had your Waterloos too.
Oooh Debbie, I LOVE how rebellious you are! :-)
I'm with you though - books and movies, who comes up with the best seller list and the Academy nominated movies when at least half of them are usually crap.
I too WILL NOT read the Twilight series. I also HATE Nicholas Sparks type books and films. I guess I'm just un-romantic that way though.
I tried to read the Davinci Code and put it down a few chapters in. I did make it through the movie though and also the Lord of the Rings movie. I must like trolls and short people for some odd reason, LOL!
I like to read easy books with just a few characters and not real complex dialogues. I just want it to be fun b/c life itself is already so complex and hard to deal with some times.
But everyone is different - thank gawd - just like you said. Diversity is what makes your post so great and all your commenters so wonderful too. Because if we were all alike, we'd end up like the Stepford Wives or Children of the Corn. And THAT would be downright scary!! :-)
I'm a fool for books too. Lately it has been mostly of non-fiction though. I just finished "The Outliers", by Malcolm Gladwell. Easy, interesting read. Haven't done the LOTR and don't plan too. My confessional? I haven't read any of the Harry Potters. Gasp!
Loved this post! I just read a great quote which I can't find now for the life of me that said "Life's too short not to read the good books first". I agree completely. I love fiction and women's fiction, and some people look down on me for my literary choices. You know what? They make me happy, and that's all that matters :) I will slog through a book, though, if I'm reviewing it for a publisher, even if that means that my review consists of "I couldn't wait for it to be done!"
I agree with this so much! And yes...who is it that deems some of these 'classics' as classics? LoL...same as movies...some of these that are so highly touted are THEEE WORST!
The fact that you don't drool over Twighlight makes me love you. I also resisted reading it until a few moths ago and quite frankly my dear, it sucked. I wouldn't want my teenage daughter reading it. Just for the record, that's called stalking. Not love. You can go to jail for that.
But anyway...my dark secret? I hated "Love in a Time of Cholera". And Shakespeare confuses the hell out of me. It's too much work and I like to read to relax, not sweat.
Great post!
My theory is it's ok to not finish a book every once in a while. I bought about 5 books that Oprah's Book Club recommended and they all sucked...ok, they were all depressing. I finished them but learned that Oprah's Book club isn't all it's cracked up to be.
One of the things that I love about my book club is that you never can tell who will like what. I've been meeting with the same group of women for ten years and there are books that are beloved by some that I could barely finish and would not have finished if it were not for book club. But I do find it interesting to see why others like books that I had to slog my way through.
I haven't even heard of most of those books. And I wish I hadn't heard of Twilight.
I am with you on Reading Lolita in Tehran. Yuck. Haven't even attempted Lord of the Rings.
i loved lord of the rings, but i seriously doubt i would have made it through the trilogy without it being a requirement for my oxford Christian writers literature class.
I hated Sense and Senseability. I just wanted to slap those girls and tell them to get over these guys. There are better ones! Seriously!
I've tried several times to get through Lord of the Rings and I just can't do it. Loved the movies though. I have a really hard time getting through Jane Austen's books. I've only ever read Pride and Prejudice.
Twilight Schmilight.
Pursuit of Happyness is the last book I read. Great book!
Bill Faulkner and Ernie Hemmingway are both pretty disappointing. I think Faulkner's typewriter didn't have keys for punctuation.
I tried reading Lord of the Rings... I got about 200 pages into it and then quit. I liked the movies though.
I couldn't do Shakespeare either. And only just read Jane Austen in my late 40ies.
No interest in the Twilight books but totally surprised myself by loving Harry Potter. I read them so I would know what my nephew was talking about. All seven. In two weeks. Whew.
I find I now love Dickens where I couldn't stand him in High School.
Most current "literary" writers I cannot abide. So be it.
I like romance novels really silly vampire ones and that is my classics
I am sooo sad that you don't like the Ring Trilogy...
I hated Reading Lolita in Tehran, but I couldn't agree more I love books set in other cultures. I learned something from it, but I hated reading it. Never read the Twilight series. Thought my book group was going to shoot me for it, but I couldn't get into all the hype. And I couldn't get through Lord of the Rings either. We may have something in common in the literary corner :)
Everyone and I mean everyone has different tastes in books...
I didn't care for The Lovely Bones and it seems everyone else loved it.
I wouldn't even start the Twilight series because it seemed laughably stupid but my grown daughter loved it!
I am clearly not on any literary perch...no fears in my falling!
From high school until recently, I shuddered at the thought of reading anything Shakespeare. Then last Fall, I was required to read Hamlet for a Nothing class. I was blown away. I couldn't read it fast enough. I have no idea what made this better to me now.
i never like the same books as everyone else. i still like books i liked as a kid.
I don't do those fantasy series either, LOTR, Harry Potter, etc. So not for me!
There is nothing like a great Library book...
I felt the same way when I went to an art museum, looked at a couple of "arty" photographs and left. It seems that full frontal nudity is "in". I am beginning to think that "art" has nothing to do with "taste".
Ah, wonderous variety. It really is the spice of life!
I've always had a problem with most of the classics. I blame it on Hemingway.
The worst book I ever read was that New Age thing that Oprah was talking about for so long. Someone bought me the book, but it was torture to try and read ONE paragraph of it.
The only thing I liked about LTR movie was Viggo Mortensen. Damn.
Well I have to say it. Why would anybody want to read Lolita? In any country. Now there was a sick book. Doping up a 12 year old to have your way with her. Yep. Great stuff. Oh! Excuse me. Did I just bag on a classic?
Every seemed to love "She's Come Undone" by Wally Lamb when it came out. I tried to read it twice but I keep falling asleep.
I just got to say, I love the pics on your blog!! You are so creative...
I love to read too! Never any time anymore....sad!
I can't tell you the number of times I have tried to read "Reading Lolita..." The book is still on my dresser, awaiting another attempt. I should just give up!
I also didn't like 100 yrs of Solitude! I kept reading and reading waiting for it to grab me and it never did! I felt compelled to read it after Oprah & Co. gushed on and on about it! I actually wondered if I wasn't as intellectual and smart as I thought I was, ha ha. This was great to read this.
I couldn't get into Lord of the Rings either. Everytime I visit my Dad he's all, "You need to read it!"
Meg Cabot, Jennifer Weiner, Philippa Gregory and Sophie Kinsella are my favorites.
Lawd, I know what you mean.
Try being a writer, where sometimes other writers and other people will expect me to have read this and that and the other or to know who wrote what or this author did what or who or where, and I don't have a clue....
I did finally read some E Hemingway, some V Woolf, and I forget.....
I doubt I will ever read Jane Austin - just no interest in the language.
There are books THOUSANDS of people loved, and I couldn't get through them - DaVince Code is one of them...tried 3 times...gave up.
Yes! Such a personal thing.
I disliked Twilight GREATLY!
I can't stand The Red Badge of Courage.
I give a book 3 chapters, if I'm hooked I will continue, if not, ADIOS!
A dagger to my heart. Shakespeare overrated? Say it isn't so.
I was given Reading Lolita in Tehran years ago at Christmas. I have never been able to bring myself to open it up. Thanks for validating that it was ok that I haven't done that!l
I love a confession... I couldn't finish (or, well, start) Reading Lolita in Tehran either. It was a bore. And I even lived in the Middle East for a while so I really love those books.
My sis recently gave me Rebecca, insisting it's a fab read. I tried. Three times. I just gave it away.
Oops ;)
I've the exact same experience with Marquez' books. Yawn fest. I haven't tried Twilight and won't. Sounds ridiculous to me. Not interested in REading Lolita in Tehran or Three Cups of Tea, either. Many times books that everyone raves about don't interest me and I just don't bother. As for the classics - couldnt' get past page 1 of Moby Dick, Wuthering Heights was just plain awful. Believe it or not I've never read Austen (though I do intend to - some day). Loved Jane Eyre and Shakespeare! But, I agree, life is way too short to read books that do not hold your interest. Regardless of what the masses say. What do they know anyway?
I don't follow any list. Why do people put importance on a list. Nothing wrong with dropping a book if it doesn't grab you (unless it's an assignment)
Myself I read mostly non-fiction.
"I've watched each of my children develop an appreciation for types of literature they didn't realize they would enjoy at all."
I'm so jealous. Your kids actually read what they're assigned?
Solitude did require the ability to slog through. As did Reading Lolita. Now, Lolita - that was a great read even though the subject matter difficult. Some that are marked classics I never get very far. Others, I can't believe I didn't know how great they were.
And Shakespeare? I so love his comedies and so hate Hamlet.
I'm pretty shallow -- and prefer books that make me laugh even as they make me see things a little differently.
P.S.
I just read my comment on your original post. I see that I still ramble.
My taste in books is so diverse, I can read just about anything. But like you, I didn't care for the Lord of the Ring books...and I've never even attempted to read the Harry Potter books.
Pssst. A little secret. I'm not huge on many of the classics either. :D
XOXO
WOW...you are SOOO right...some of the POPULAR books just do not speak to me and I TRY...OH how I try to like them and then realize I just can't do it!
I, like you am more of a winter reader. In summer I prefer a magazine or a short story...the weather keeps me engaged in other things!
LOVE SHAKESPEARE in sunglasses! With a look like this his rap name should be Billy Shake!!!!
I was with you until LOTR... how can you not love them?!?!? Oh, Debbie!! Try again :)
And there is no literary perch from which to fall. Just enjoy and be happy....
Agree with you on Twilight and Lord of the Rings trilogy. I tried to read Marquez in Spanish (almost as easy as English for me), got a little over half way and felt the solitude. . . so I abandoned. Although I have always wondered what happened to the maids child.
Now do a post on the books you LIKED :)
I have never read most of those books you mentioned - lol. Not even Twilight, which I don't plan on reading or seeing the movie. I did like the Lord of The Ring movies, but never read the books and for some reason in High School I actually didn't mind Shakespeare.
My goodness, everyone wants to tell you you're right: some books are overrated. One day, you'll write your own list of 100 best.
You find the BEST pictures that always make me giggle and brighten my day! Thank you for being the great person you are! Thank you again for your kinds words, I so needed that.
Now onto Jaba you flipping kill me I love it! I so do the same, and the library rocks for books. I download the audio ones and listen to them while I work, it makes the day go by so fast and you can finish a book in 2 or 3 days. Love it!
I do agree some of them I get a few pages in and I'm done. And I'm so bad I also choose by the covers. I know it's bad I just can't help it.
You are such a hoot! I give books about 50 pages. If i am not into them by then, gone. There are plenty more out there that I'll love!
Great post! Just as well that we don't all like the same books...
I love One Hundred Years, but like you, just couldn't get into Reading Lolita in Tehran. I read the first book 'Twilight', but really didn't want to waste my time by reading the other three books. (Please don't hate me...)
Since my children were born I can't do anything that chronicles horrifying tales of child abuse, and I can't do anything that involves torturing women. On another point, author Salman Rushdie went into hiding for so many years over his book The Satanic Verses, and many people at the time had it on their coffee tables, so much so that it was an instant best seller, but I never met anyone who actually read it...
ughhh...i couldn't make it through lord of the rings!! give me a trashy novel anyday!
Your secret is out... Well, I guess I'll still like you. :D Personal opinion is what this is all about.(Blogging)
I have a feeling Britney is reading a "how to _____" book...you fill in the blank.
Are you in a book club? I have always wanted to be in a book club....
I hear you! I have a hard time committing to those 800-page tomes on the best seller lists these days. Enough for me to go to Amazon and see what the publisher had to say about it in a paragraph. Then I have enough to talk to people.
If I find an author I like, I read everything that person wrote for as long as it takes. When I was a kid, I had the reward of discovering Louisa May Alcott wrote gothic fiction after her stint as a nurse in the Civil War. If I hadn't have been a monomaniac, I never would have known.
I agree with other you; Shakespeare is TOTALLY overrated.....All I can say about him is B.O.R.I.N.G! :)
Give me a copy of Gone with the Wind, and I am lost for hours! :)
Thanks for visiting my blog and leaving a comment...the first day of school went well for both of my teens, and, thankfully, their teachers were merciful and didn't load them up with homework!
Read what you like!! At least you are open minded enough to try new things and that's always a plus!!!
Lord of the Rings...blech for both movies & books. One Hundred Years of Solitude. *sigh* I've tried 3 times to get into that book & simply can't. I need to get somewhere during nap time otherwise, it doesn't happen.
LOL, I have to agree with you!
I am so with you on this. There are way too many books to read to make myself struggle through a book I am just not enjoying.
All too often I find the books that are getting the most hoopla are the ones I like the least. I guess I like to make my own discoveries, not be told what to like by the masses.
I love reading, but like you, there are just some books I can't get into reading... even books that I think will be great, I start reading them, and I'm like... "Ugh! I hate this book..."
I like the Jabba the Hut reference... my mom says this about herself... even though she doesn't look at all like Jabba the Hut! ;)
i love your suggestion s...
will try some..
you write very well..
shraddha
I'd rather pluck out all my eyebrow hairs one by one then try to finish that excuse called One hundred years of solitude. Ghastly... I tried but that book was awful.
I am so glad I was not the only one with that sentiment.
I havent read LOTR or seen the movies. Not interested at all.
oh I love to read but never find the time, I have a whole library in my dayroom that's waiting for me LOL! There are some books that are highly recommended and when I try to get into them it just doesn't happen. I guess by now I should know what type of books I like to read and which ones will def give me a headache, like Shakespeare, I love the stories but def need the cliff notes for translation!!LOL
Love to read! As much as possible. Right now I am reading Jodi Picoult. She is controversial, but good. If you haven't read it yet try My Sister's Keeper. Very good.
I haven't read some of the ones you listed, but did like the Twilight series. I just need to find more I like. Any suggestions?
Shakespeare and I don't get along. I think it might be my ADHD mind. Just can't do it...
I can totally relate. Remember "Eat, Pray, Love"? I thought it should be "Eat, Pray, Lament." Loathed it. And now she's out with another one. Argh.
Yep, I'm with you on how some "classics" do nothing for me. But others I read, re-read and re-read again. I think literature, like food, is subjective and our tastes depend on a lot of different things...our background and upbringing, our experiences, our personalities...
I used to HAVE to read every last page of any book I started. No longer. I try to give the book a good chance but if after 50 pages or so it hasn't grabbed me yet, I'm outta there. There are way more books than time to read them all.
I share your view on every single one of the books mentioned, (true confessions), but I do not think Shakespeare's overrated. No way! ;-]
I've never read a book series, though I probably would enjoy reading Lord of the Rings.
I enjoy Great Expectations, but at one point I was stuck in the middle and could not move forward. I finally decided to skip that chapter.
Didn't check to see if this was recommended, but I can read Homer's Iliad again and again.
I'm with you! What's really a sign of strong character is to be able to take a book back to the library and feel good about it...
Different strokes for different folks.
yeah, i didn't like Reading Lolita in Tehran, either. i barely finished Sense and Sensibility, and did not want to go back for Pride and Predjudice, even though that seems to make me a lousy excuse for a reader and a woman. and i couldn't finish On the Road--boring!
I totally can't read Lord of the Rings either!! (But I am a fan of the movies.) I was discussing the books with my ex-SIL's father and I said I thought they were SUPER boring and he was all, "Well, you have to be pretty smart to enjoy them." I was like, "Dude. I've seen the movies. They're about fairies, short people with hairy feet, wizards, and a ring. I don't think a high IQ plays into this one. It isn't Trig."
But I worry sometimes like maybe I'm totally missing something and I'm just not all there when I think one of the classics is boring and not worth the time.
I feel the same way about "Great Expectations." No Dickens for me, thank you. Some literature just should be a movie and that's that.
I don't know why but that Jabba the Hut picture CRACKS ME UP!
I've had similar experiences with really wanting to enjoy a book but finally having to admit that I just don't like it. I tend to stick with mysteries and non-fiction. I find that those are the books that keep my attention the best!
I hated Water for Elephants. Hated. And The Devil in the White City. And I'm supposed to read Hawaii by James Michener for book club and can't even get started.
100 years of solitude is my all-times favourite book, but it's ok. I still like you.
I never abandon a book I have started, no matter how much I don't like it. I am all for giving every single book a chance... and a second one... and a third one... and more...
That said, I seem to dislike French writers, like Zola or Flaubert. On the other hand, I love an American/German/Irish one, John Steinbeck. I could read Grapes of Wrath and Tortilla flat a thousand times.
How true!
I enjoyed Naipaul's House of Mr. Biswas but didnt get the critical acclaim it received, and yes havent read Twilight or Lord of the Rings - dont think I will either. It is the individual preferences that make reading as a hobby so different from one to another.
I agree-even "classics" are definitely subjective. I happen to adore Shakespeare, but I absolutely cannot stand a lot of authors that everyone else seems to love. I cannot stand Ann Rice-it's not that I object to her topics or plot lines or anything it's simply that her actual style of writing, in my opinion, STINKS. I have the same problem with Judy Picoult, JK Rowling, and Stephenie Meyer-so I dare not join a book club for fear of being bored or lynched.
You watch PBS too?!?! I Love you!!!
You are so dead on with this post. Life is too short. It's ok if you don't like something that 'everyone' else liked. This is a good reminder to be true to yourself : ). I have a whole slew of books that I start and just can't plow thru. If I am working that hard, I shouldn't be reading it! That is my new motto! : )
I didn't like "Reading Lolita..." either. I'm not sure I even finished it.
But passing up O. Bloom??? Never!
Hmm, I loved Twilight, but I read mainly to escape reality :) Hubby feels he needs to spend his time reading non-fiction, to learn something. I'm more of a "calgon take me away" reader, I like to be entertained. To each his own! I guess books are like art.
Okay, so I do love me some Shakespeare. Don't hate, m'kay?!
I learned early on to not ready anything Oprah recommended. Too depressing, too graphic, etc.
I love the movies I've seen of Pride and Prejudice (and there are quite a few), but for the life of me, I cannot get through the book itself. I'm so ashamed . . .
I can't read Oprah books either! Or anything self help or new age...I'm far too cynical for all that crap.
I recently went through a reading phase where I was in the library literally devouring books. If I didn't like it by second chapter it was NEXT! Life's too short to read a boring book. There have only been a few that I have literally battled with to the end. I survived 100 years of Solitude (at uni). It was annoying but I still think of it.
The fatter the book the better! I hate getting to know the characters and BOOM it's over!
Secret indulgence is Jilly Cooper novels...LOVE THEM
You know, reading is one of my biggest hobbies, as I majored in it and I also write for a living. But I have yet to meet someone that didn't love 100 Years of Solitude. I read the book two years ago and found it extremely disappointing. I just don't understand the hype around it. Boring. I simply don't understand why it is considered a classic. I struggled to turn the pages out of lack of interest.
First I have to say I love your posts with all the fun pictures. I am such a visual person, your blogging makes me happy.
Second, I agree many classics are no fun for me to read. And it TOTALLY depends on my mood for a certain book.
Sark is an artsy girl who just tickles your arsty creative side, along with some Shel Silverstein for a good giggle.
I am more of a Dean Koontz, Stephen King kinda girl myself. And I puffy red heart the Twilight series.
To each their own!
Queen of Feisty
I love a lot of classic books, but there are a couple that I've been partially through for nearly 20 years. It's just that way.
I re-read The Lord of the Rings trilogy about 4 years ago when I was in a don't-lift-a-finger-recovery-mode from a surgery. I admit to not liking them as well as I did when I read them the first time at 16.
I think movies are the same. I'm glad we don't all like the same things both in books and movies. And I'm guessing the writers are glad,too.
I'm with you on the Lord of the Rings ... tried several times and just quit at book 3 each time. The Hobbit was good though.
And Twilight is just pure guilty candy reading ... read it and forget it but it was sweet going down.
I'd love to hear about some of the books you LOVED. I'm going to give The Book Thief a try because of your (and many others) recommendation.
Post a Comment